Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2026-06-05

Rethinking photosensitization in therapy and sun protection.

Erick L Bastos, Waleska K Martins, Rosangela Itri, Thiago T Tasso, Maurício S Baptista

Department of Fundamental Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo 05508-000 São Paulo SP Brazil [email protected]. · pubmed

Abstract

Light-induced tissue damage involves photosensitization. This process forms the basis of photodynamic therapy but also underlies photoaging and skin cancer development during excessive sun exposure. This review bridges these interlinked, yet rarely connected fields. We propose a unified classification distinguishing photosensitizers, photocatalysts, photoinitiators, and photocatalytic initiators based on absorber fate and downstream radical chain propagation. This framework resolves longstanding ambiguities and carries direct mechanistic consequences. Our central thesis is that subcellular localization determines the biological outcome far more than quantum yields. Membrane-bound photosensitizers permeabilize organelles orders of magnitude more efficiently than their broadly distributed counterparts, provided direct photosensitizer-lipid contact favors truncated lipid generation through Type I electron-transfer reactions rather than singlet oxygen oxidation. Organelle-specific targeting exploits this principle. Mitochondrial photodamage triggers regulated cell death through cardiolipin oxidation and cytochrome c release. Lysosomal targeting induces cathepsin release and autophagy dysfunction, often proving more effective for long-term cell killing. Dual-organelle strategies activate apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis synergistically. These same mechanisms operate during sun exposure. Lipofuscin mediates radical chain amplification, creating a feed-forward cycle of visible light sensitivity in aging skin. Pheomelanin acts as a Type I photosensitizer generating superoxide and hydrogen peroxide under visible light, while eumelanin dissipates photon energy as heat. The amplification inherent in photoinitiated processes explains why modest light doses overwhelm antioxidant defenses, tipping redox homeostasis from eustress to distress. We translate these insights into mechanistically rational photoprotection strategies addressing visible light beyond conventional UV filters and into design principles for next-generation therapeutic photosensitizers.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper proposes a unified mechanistic framework distinguishing photosensitizers from photocatalysts and argues that subcellular localization, rather than quantum yield, dictates whether light exposure leads to beneficial therapeutic outcomes or detrimental aging processes via specific organelle damage. This work is relevant because it addresses photoaging and oxidative stress, which are fundamental drivers of biological aging, by offering a mechanistic explanation for how visible light contributes to cellular senescence and tissue damage, thereby informing strategies to mitigate these root causes of aging.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.