Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2026-05-24

Aging as the degradation of conjunctive coupling: A triadic framework S = F × E × N for biological senescence.

Henri Farreny

Independent Researcher, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: [email protected] Researcher, Toulouse, France. Electronic address: [email protected]. · pubmed

Abstract

Despite the landmark identification of twelve hallmarks of aging (López-Otín et al., 2023), geroscience lacks a formal account of why these hallmarks interact and amplify each other, why mono-target interventions show systematically limited efficacy, and what determines the threshold at which compensatory mechanisms fail. A recent extension of the hallmarks framework has further integrated psychosocial and social determinants of aging (López-Otín & Kroemer, 2025; Kroemer et al., 2025), reinforcing the need for an architectural account that can accommodate both molecular and environmental modulators within a single formal structure. The hallmarks framework, in its current form, remains descriptively comprehensive but architecturally silent: it documents what accumulates without specifying why the regulatory system that normally contains these accumulations progressively loses coherence. This article proposes a minimal architectural framework - S = F × E × N - in which F designates the flux of biological signals (genomic, epigenetic, metabolic, intercellular), E the executive and energetic machinery (mitochondrial function, proteostasis, autophagy), and N the normative epigenetic constraint (chromatin architecture, DNA methylation landscape, cell identity program). The × operator denotes conjunctive necessity: stable organized biological state S exists only when F, E, and N are simultaneously coupled and functional. The central contribution is a specific architectural claim: aging is not primarily the degradation of F, E, or N individually, but the progressive erosion of the × operator - the conjunctive coupling that maintains their coherent interaction. Within this framework, N occupies a structurally asymmetric position: as the normative anchor that governs the F→E transaction, N erosion is sufficient to collapse × even when F and E remain intact. This asymmetry - not N-primacy as an independent thesis - explains why Yang et al. (2023a) found that epigenetic information loss alone reproduces full aging phenotypes and that OSK-mediated N restoration reverses them. The pathological unit remains × ; N is the component through which × is most vulnerable to disruption and most tractable for therapeutic intervention. Formalized within Partial Information Decomposition theory as the synergistic information I_synergistic(F,E,N), × erosion is in principle computable on multi-omic data using established PID estimators and is directly falsifiable. The framework predicts why hallmarks accelerate each other (conjunctive failure propagates across components), why mono-target interventions fail (restoring one component does not restore the coupling), and why combined N + E interventions should produce superadditive healthspan effects. Three priority testable predictions and a CouplingIndex measurement pipeline are derived.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper proposes a theoretical framework defining aging as the erosion of conjunctive coupling between biological flux, executive machinery, and normative constraints, predicting that restoring this coupling (specifically via epigenetic normalization) yields superadditive healthspan effects. This work is relevant because it attempts to address the root cause of aging by providing an architectural explanation for hallmark interactions and offering a falsifiable, computable model for therapeutic intervention, although it currently remains a conceptual proposal rather than an empirical breakthrough.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.