Biological organ ages associate with risk of chronic diseases in a community-based population.
Abstract
The biological age of organs may better quantify risk for health deterioration compared with chronological age. We investigated organ-specific aging patterns in a community-based cohort and assessed the associations with adverse health outcomes. Biological ages of 11 organs were estimated for 11,757 participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (55.6% women, mean age, 57.1 years) using a circulating protein-based model. Older organ ages were significantly associated with related adverse outcomes, even after accounting for chronological age; for example, older arteries and hearts were associated with an increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD; hazard ratio [HR] per 5-year-higher age gap, 1.22; 95% CI [1.13-1.31] and 1.16 [1.07-1.26], respectively, and older lungs with lung cancer (HR 1.12 [1.09-1.16]). Hierarchical agglomerative clustering based on organ ages revealed 3 patient phenotypes: those with older organs, normal/slightly older organs, and younger organs. The patients with older organs were at higher risk for cancer (HR 1.19; 95% CI [1.08-1.31]), death (HR 1.75 [1.64-1.86]), end-stage kidney disease (HR 6.12 [4.65-8.06]), CHD (HR 1.21 [1.06-1.38]), heart failure (HR 1.92 [1.73-2.13]), infection (HR 1.56 [1.44-1.68]), and stroke (HR 1.36 [1.16-1.61]). Proteomic organ aging signatures demonstrated significant associations with multiple adverse health outcomes and may be useful for health risk identification.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
Older biological organ ages are associated with increased risks of various chronic diseases and mortality. The study investigates biological aging of organs, which is directly related to understanding and potentially mitigating the root causes of aging and age-related diseases.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.