Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2025-01-13

Increased clonal hematopoiesis in long-term survivors of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Konradin F Müskens, Nienke Wieringa, Maaike G J M van Bergen, Joëll E Bense, Brigit M Te Pas, Anne P J de Pagter, Arjan C Lankester, Marc B Bierings, Donna S Neuberg, Saskia Haitjema, Leontien C M Kremer, Gerwin A Huls, Stefan Nierkens, Joop H Jansen, Caroline A Lindemans, Aniek O de Graaf, Mirjam E Belderbos

Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, Netherlands. · pubmed

Abstract

In pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients, transplanted donor cells may need to function far beyond normal human lifespan. Here, we investigated the risk of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in 144 pediatric long-term HCT survivors and 258 non-transplanted controls. CH was detected in 16% of HCT recipients and 8% of controls, at variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of 0.01-0.31. Mutations were predominantly in DNMT3A (80%) and TET2 (20%). Older hematopoietic age (odds ratio: 1.07, p<0.001) and the HCT procedure (odds ratio: 2.53, p=0.02) independently increased the risk of CH, indicating both aging- and transplantation-induced effects. Large clones (VAF >0.10) were found exclusively in HCT recipients. Notably, CH was also detected within 15 years after a cord blood HCT. Inflammatory processes around graft infusion were associated with CH presence. Future studies are required to track the evolution of post-transplant CH and its impact on future cardiovascular disease, second malignancies and overall survival.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper investigates clonal hematopoiesis in long-term survivors of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation, which has implications for understanding aging processes and potential long-term health outcomes. While it provides solid research on the effects of transplantation and aging, its findings are more focused on the consequences of these conditions rather than addressing the root causes of aging or lifespan extension. Thus, it contributes to the field but with limited impact.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.