Aging-induced Alternation in the Gut Microbiota Impairs Host Antibacterial Defense.
Abstract
Older individuals experience increased susceptibility and mortality to bacterial infections, but the underlying etiology remains unclear. Herein, it is shown that aging-associated reduction of commensal Parabacteroides goldsteinii (P. goldsteinii) in both aged mice and humans critically contributes to worse outcomes of bacterial infection. The colonization of live P. goldsteinii conferred protection against aging-associated bacterial infections. Metabolomic profiling reveals a protective compound, apigenin, generated by P. goldsteinii, antagonizes bacterial clearance defects in aged mice. AMP-binding protein (ampB) is identified as a key gene involved in apigenin synthesis in P. goldsteinii using homologous recombination in bacteria. Mechanistically, apigenin binds directly to the potential sites on Fgr (M341 and D404), preventing its inhibitory role on Vav1 phosphorylation, and therefore promoting the activation of Cdc42/Rac1, Arp2/3 expression and subsequent actin reorganization, which contributes to the enhanced phagocytosis of macrophages to bacteria. Collectively, the findings suggest that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota may impair host defense mechanisms and increase susceptibility to bacterial infections in older adults and highlight the microbiota-apigenin-Fgr axis as a possible route to ameliorate aging-associated antibacterial defects.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper addresses the relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and increased susceptibility to bacterial infections in older adults, which is a significant aspect of aging and its associated health challenges. It explores a potential mechanism involving the microbiota and a protective compound, apigenin, which could contribute to understanding and potentially mitigating age-related decline in immune function. However, while the findings are solid and contribute to the field, they do not represent a major breakthrough or transformative insight, thus warranting a moderate impact score.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.