DNA damage causes ATM-dependent heterochromatin loss leading to nuclear softening, blebbing, and rupture.
Abstract
The nucleus must maintain stiffness to preserve its shape and integrity to ensure proper function. Defects in nuclear stiffness caused from chromatin and lamin perturbations produce abnormal nuclear shapes common in aging, heart disease, and cancer. Loss of nuclear shape via protrusions called blebs lead to nuclear rupture that is well-established to cause nuclear dysfunction, including DNA damage. However, it remains unknown how increased DNA damage affects nuclear stiffness, shape, and ruptures, which could create a feedback loop. To determine if increased DNA damage alters nuclear physical properties, we treated MEF cells with DNA damage drugs cisplatin and bleomycin. DNA damage drugs caused increased nuclear blebbing and rupture in interphase nuclei within a few hours and independent of mitosis. Micromanipulation force measurements reveal that DNA damage decreased chromatin-based nuclear mechanics but did not change lamin-based strain stiffening at long extensions relative to wild type. Immunofluorescence measurements of DNA damage treatments reveal the mechanism is an ATM-dependent decrease in heterochromatin leading to nuclear weaken, blebbing, and rupture which can be rescued upon ATM inhibition treatment. Thus, DNA damage drugs cause ATM-dependent heterochromatin loss resulting in nuclear softening, blebbing, and rupture.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper investigates the relationship between DNA damage and nuclear mechanics, specifically how this damage affects nuclear stiffness and integrity, which are critical factors in aging and age-related diseases. By exploring the ATM-dependent mechanisms leading to nuclear softening and rupture, the research touches on fundamental processes that could contribute to the understanding of cellular aging. However, while the findings are solid and contribute to the field, they do not present a major breakthrough or transformative implications, thus warranting a moderate impact score.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.