Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2024-12-01

SenMayo transcriptomic senescence panel highlights glial cells in the ageing mouse and human retina.

Samyuktha Suresh, Gayathri Karthik, John F Ouyang, Vicki Chrysostomou, See Aik Tang, Enrico Petretto, Jonathan G Crowston, Katharina C Bell

Neuroscience and Behavioural Diseases and Eye-ACP, Centre for Vision Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. · pubmed

Abstract

There is a growing need to better characterise senescent cells in the CNS and retina. The recently published SenMayo gene panel was developed to identify transcriptomic signatures of senescence across multiple organ systems, but the retina was not included. While other approaches have identified senescent signatures in the retina, these have largely focused on experimental models in young animals. We therefore conducted a detailed single-cell RNA-seq analysis to identify senescent cell populations in the retina of different aged mice and compared these with five comprehensive human and mouse retina and brain transcriptome datasets. Transcriptomic signatures of senescence were most apparent in mouse and human retinal glial cells, with IL4, 13 and 10 and the AP1 pathway being the most prominent markers involved. Similar levels of transcriptional senescence were observed in the retinal glia of young and old mice, whereas the human retina showed significantly increased enrichment scores with advancing age.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper is relevant to longevity research as it investigates senescent cells in the retina, focusing on the underlying mechanisms of aging at the cellular level. By identifying transcriptomic signatures of senescence in glial cells, it contributes to understanding how aging affects the central nervous system, which is crucial for addressing age-related diseases. However, while the findings are solid and provide valuable insights, they do not represent a major breakthrough or transformative advancement in the field, hence the moderate impact score.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.