The Epistemic Policies of Anti-Ageing Medicines in the European Union.
Abstract
Anti-ageing medicines are products intended to extend lifespan and healthspan in humans that have a good potential use in public health policies. In the European Union, their development, production and consumption are dependent on regulatory science performed by the European Medicines Agency and its associated epistemic policies. They impose, among other things, an unfavourable burden of proof, a strict standard of proof and meta-methodological constrictions related to some theoretical issues. This results in a distribution of errors that tends to reduce false positives while increasing false negatives, leading to a set of social consequences that are generally accepted when the focus is placed on conventional medicines. However, when the same epistemic policies are applied to anti-ageing medicines, the distribution of errors is imbalanced, and undesirable outcomes like research discouragement and waiting time extensions appear. Three possible strategies that policymakers could implement to unblock the situation are presented for future reflection: the consideration of ageing as a disease, the application of methodological asymmetry and the use of biomarkers during clinical research.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper discusses the regulatory and epistemic challenges surrounding anti-ageing medicines in the European Union, which is directly related to the field of longevity research. However, it primarily focuses on the implications of regulatory policies rather than presenting novel scientific findings or solutions that advance the understanding of aging or lifespan extension. The proposed strategies for policymakers are relevant but do not constitute a significant scientific contribution, leading to a low impact score.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.