Changing dynamics in daily rhythms of oxidative stress indicators in SCN and extra-SCN brain regions with aging in male Wistar rats.
Abstract
The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the hypothalamus regulates circadian timing system (CTS) by co-ordinating peripheral tissue clocks and extra-SCN oscillators in the brain. Aging disrupts the CTS, impairing physiological functions and reducing antioxidant defences, which contribute to neurodegeneration. The brain is vulnerable to oxidative damage due to its high metabolic activity, oxygen consumption, and levels of iron and lipids. Antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), glutathione S-transferase (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and lipid peroxidation (LPO), help against oxidative damage. In this study, we examined the temporal patterns of these antioxidant stress indicators in the SCN and extra-SCN brain regions (frontal cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus) at various time points in male Wistar rats 3, 12, and 24 months. The rhythmicity of GST and LPO levels persisted across brain regions with aging, while CAT rhythmicity was lost in the SCN and hippocampus of older rats. SOD rhythmicity persisted in cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus but was lost in the SCN. The daily rhythm parameters of CAT were affected most significantly, followed by SOD, GST, and LPO. Our findings demonstrate that aging leads to desynchronization of oxidative stress indicators potentially contributing to neurodegeneration and circadian dysfunction with varying effects across different brain tissues.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper investigates the effects of aging on oxidative stress indicators and circadian rhythms in the brain, which are relevant to understanding the biological mechanisms of aging and neurodegeneration. However, while it contributes to the knowledge of how aging affects these processes, it does not propose solutions to mitigate aging or its effects, limiting its impact on the field of longevity research. The findings are solid but represent an incremental advance rather than a significant breakthrough.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.