Aging, ROS, and cellular senescence: a trilogy in the progression of liver fibrosis.
Abstract
Ageing is an inevitable and multifaceted biological process that impacts a wide range of cellular and molecular mechanisms, leading to the development of various diseases, such as liver fibrosis. Liver fibrosis progresses to cirrhosis, which is an advanced form due to high amounts of extracellular matrix and restoration of normal liver structure with failure to repair damaged tissue and cells, marking the end of liver function and total liver failure, ultimately death. The most important factors are reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cellular senescence. Oxidative stress is defined as an impairment by ROS, which are by-products of the mitochondrial electron transport chain and other key molecular pathways that induce cell damage and can activate cellular senescence pathways. Cellular senescence is characterized by pro-inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and proteases secreted by senescent cells, collectively known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The presence of senescent cells, which disrupt tissue architecture and function and increase senescent cell production in liver tissues, contributes to fibrogenesis. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are activated in response to chronic liver injury, oxidative stress, and senescence signals that drive excessive production and deposition of extracellular matrix. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathogenic role of ROS and cellular senescence in the aging liver and their contribution to fibrosis.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper discusses the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cellular senescence in the aging liver and their contribution to liver fibrosis, which is relevant to understanding age-related diseases. However, it primarily focuses on the mechanisms of disease progression rather than addressing the root causes of aging or proposing solutions for lifespan extension. Thus, while it contributes to the field of aging research, its impact is limited and more incremental than groundbreaking.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.