Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2024-10-29

The evolution of ageing: classic theories and emerging ideas.

Mark T Mc Auley

School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford Manchester, Salford, M5 4NT, UK. [email protected] of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford Manchester, Salford, M5 4NT, UK. [email protected]. · pubmed

Abstract

Ageing is generally regarded as a non-adaptive by-product of evolution. Based on this premise three classic evolutionary theories of ageing have been proposed. These theories have dominated the literature for several decades. Despite their individual nuances, the common thread which unites them is that they posit that ageing results from a decline in the intensity of natural selection with chronological age. Empirical evidence has been identified which supports each theory. However, a consensus remains to be fully established as to which theory best accounts for the evolution of ageing. A consequence of this uncertainty are counter arguments which advocate for alternative theoretical frameworks, such as those which propose an adaptive origin for ageing, senescence, or death. Given this backdrop, this review has several aims. Firstly, to briefly discuss the classic evolutionary theories. Secondly, to evaluate how evolutionary forces beyond a monotonic decrease in natural selection can affect the evolution of ageing. Thirdly, to examine alternatives to the classic theories. Finally, to introduce a pluralistic interpretation of the evolution of ageing. The basis of this pluralistic theoretical framework is the recognition that certain evolutionary ideas will be more appropriate depending on the organism, its ecological context, and its life history.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper discusses the evolution of ageing and evaluates both classic and emerging theories related to the biological processes of ageing. It aims to provide a pluralistic interpretation of ageing, which is relevant to understanding the root causes of ageing and potentially informing lifespan extension strategies. However, while it presents solid research and contributes to the theoretical framework of ageing, it does not provide groundbreaking findings or practical applications that would significantly advance the field, thus earning a moderate impact score.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.