The role of amino acids in skeletal muscle health and sarcopenia: A narrative review.
Abstract
The skeletal muscle is the largest organ present inside the body and is responsible for mechanical activities like maintaining posture, movement, respiratory function, and support for the health and functioning of other systems of the body. Skeletal muscle atrophy is a condition associated with a reduction in muscle size, strength, and activity, which leads to an increased dependency on movement, an increased risk of falls, and a reduced quality of life. Various conditions like osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and fractures are directly associated with an increased muscle atrophy. Additionally, numerous risk factors, like aging, malnutrition, physical inactivity, and certain disease conditions, through distinct pathways negatively affect skeletal muscle health and lead to muscle atrophy. Among the various determinants of the overall muscle health, the rate of muscle protein synthesis and degradation is an important parameter that eventually alters the fate of overall muscle health. In conditions of excessive skeletal muscle atrophy, including sarcopenia, the rate of muscle protein degradation usually exceeds the rate of protein synthesis. The availability of amino acids in the systemic circulation is a crucial step for muscle protein synthesis. The current review aimed to consolidate the existing evidence of amino acids, highlight their mechanisms of action, and assess their roles and effectiveness in enhancing skeletal muscle health.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper discusses the role of amino acids in skeletal muscle health and sarcopenia, which are important aspects of aging and age-related decline in muscle function. While it addresses a significant issue related to muscle atrophy and its implications for quality of life in older adults, the review primarily consolidates existing evidence rather than presenting novel findings or solutions that directly target the root causes of aging. Therefore, while it is relevant to longevity research, its impact is limited as it does not introduce groundbreaking insights or transformative approaches.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.