Machine Learning for Longitudinal Brain-Age Prediction
Abstract
Cross-sectional brain age models have demonstrated high accuracy and reliability for predicting chronological age based on structural brain features derived from single MRI scans. However, these models cannot separate baseline variation from true aging-related changes or noise. Longitudinal models address this limitation by predicting inter-scan intervals from paired MRI scans, controlling for baseline factors through repeated measurements. Using OASIS-3 data, we compare a cross-sectional 3D CNN against three longitudinal architectures for predicting inter-scan intervals: LILAC (Siamese neural network), LILAC+ (enhanced Siamese network with multi-layer perceptron), and AM (variational autoencoder). Longitudinal models substantially outperformed the cross-sectional approach, with LILAC+ achieving best performance (MSE = 1.97 years^2, MAE = 0.99 years, r = 0.86, R^2 = 0.71). Our results suggest that direct modeling of longitudinal change is more effective at capturing individual aging trajectories than deriving intervals from cross-sectional predictions.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper claims that longitudinal brain age models are more effective at predicting individual aging trajectories than cross-sectional models. This research is relevant as it addresses the complexities of aging by improving predictive models that could enhance our understanding of individual aging processes.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.