Lifespan costs of reproduction increase during the Great Finnish Famine
Abstract
Evolutionary theory of aging predicts that women with increased reproductive effort live shorter lives, but evidence is inconsistent. These inconsistencies could be because environmental conditions influence how much reproductive behavior shapes a mother's lifespan, i.e. their lifespan cost of reproduction. Using a structural equation measurement model, we compare how reproductive effort affects lifespan of 4,684 women exposed across different life-stages, or not at all, to the Great Finnish Famine. We find that lifespan costs of reproduction became higher in mothers exposed to the famine during reproduction, and for these mothers amounted to a decreased life expectancy of ~0.5 years per child. Conversely, reproductive behavior did not shape the lifespans of mothers not exposed to the famine, or exposed post-reproduction or during development. These results suggest environment-dependent reproductive costs, which provides a biological explanation for previous inconsistent findings, and demonstrate how reproductive behavior can be an important determinant of human lifespan.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper investigates the relationship between reproductive effort and lifespan in the context of environmental stressors, specifically the Great Finnish Famine. This aligns with longevity research by exploring how reproductive behavior can influence lifespan, suggesting that environmental factors can modulate the costs of reproduction. However, while the findings are interesting and contribute to understanding the complexities of aging, they do not present a significant breakthrough or novel insights that would dramatically advance the field of longevity research. Thus, the impact is rated as solid but limited.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.