Early-life infectious disease exposure, the 'hygiene hypothesis', and lifespan: evidence from hookworm
Abstract
Exposure to infectious disease in early life may have long-term ramifications for health and mortality. This study leverages quasi-experimental variation from the Rockefeller Sanitary Commissions de-worming campaign in the early 20th century, combined with pre-campaign hookworm prevalence, to rigorously examine the impacts of childhood hookworm exposure on later-life morbidity and lifespan. Pre-intervention surveys find widespread hookworm exposure among children in the American South, but minimal prevalence among adults. I show exposure to de-worming before age five leads to 2.5 additional months of life in a sample of older-age mortality. Further, decreasing hookworm exposure is related to later-life declines in biomarkers for inflammation and skin-tested allergies, in contrast with the predictions of the "hygiene hypothesis". Placebo tests using health outcomes that should not be affected by de-worming do not show similar patterns.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper investigates the long-term effects of early-life infectious disease exposure on lifespan, which is relevant to longevity research. However, while it provides insights into the relationship between childhood hookworm exposure and later-life health outcomes, the findings are relatively modest and do not fundamentally address the root causes of aging or lifespan extension. The contribution is solid but limited in its broader implications for the field of longevity research.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.