Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2025-07-12

Reporting quality, effect sizes, and biases for aging interventions: a methodological appraisal of the DrugAge database

Parish, A., Ioannidis, J., Zhang, K., Barardo, D., Swindell, W., de Magalhaes, J. P.

Brookdale Medical Center · biorxiv

Abstract

Though interest has grown significantly over the past decades in interventions that may slow the aging process, most evidence for these interventions still comes from experiments in non-human animals. These studies may suffer from design, quality and reporting issues. The quality and reporting of preclinical studies have not yet been studied systematically in anti-aging research. Here we analyzed the DrugAge database, assessing reporting study quality, bias and effect sizes across 667 anti-aging preclinical studies. We found significant shortcomings in reporting of crucial design features such as randomization and blinding, as well as large variation in reporting quality and effects across species. Non-mammal findings typically did not translate to mammals. Although anti-aging interventions may have different effects depending on when they are started, most studies began giving the intervention under investigation very early in the organisms lifespan. Our findings suggest there is substantial room for improvement in preclinical anti-aging research.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper claims that there are significant shortcomings in the reporting quality and design of preclinical studies on anti-aging interventions. This research is relevant as it addresses the methodological issues in studies aimed at understanding and potentially intervening in the aging process, which is central to longevity research.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.