Longevity PapersAbout
← All papers
RESEARCH PAPER / 2024-10-29

Distinct roles of brain network flexibility in motor learning across age

Uehara, K., Hagihara, M., Kitajo, K.

Toyohashi University of Technology/Division of Neural Dynamics, National Institute for Physiological Sciences · biorxiv

Abstract

Motor learning is a lifelong process, from infancy through old age. Acquiring new motor skills through repetitive practice requires adjusting motor output in response to sensory input and integrating them to facilitate learning. For this to occur, the central nervous system must flexibly predict and adapt to the dynamic interplay between sensory inputs and motor outputs. Although overall brain function changes with age, it remains unclear how neural flexibility evolves and influences motor learning ability with aging. To address this, we designed a motor learning paradigm involving both younger and older adults and quantitatively assessed neural flexibility from the perspective of functional brain networks, leveraging multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) in humans. Here we found age-related differences in motor learning properties, brain network flexibility, and their neural relationships. In younger adults, motor learning retention was associated with brain network flexibility during the preparatory period of the task. However, this association was not observed in older adults. Together, our findings establish that brain network flexibility plays a crucial role in acquiring and maintaining new motor skills in younger adults, but this relationship becomes less effective with age.

The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.

Research summary

The paper investigates the relationship between brain network flexibility and motor learning across different age groups, which is pertinent to understanding how aging affects cognitive and motor functions. However, while it contributes to the knowledge of age-related changes in motor learning, it does not address the root causes of aging or propose solutions for lifespan extension or age-related diseases. Thus, its impact is solid but limited.

Author of this paper? Send a correction.