Blood Omics Models for System-Specific Mortality Risk Estimation
Abstract
Traditional blood-based aging clocks provide an estimate of a persons overall biological age. However, physiological systems and organs age at different rates in an individual, and anti-aging interventions often target specific physiological systems. Therefore, there is a growing need for methods capable of assessing biological age at the level of specific physiological systems. Here, we used blood chemistry and cell count data from 456,180 individuals in the UK Biobank (UKB) to develop mortality-based predictors of biological age across 9 physiological systems matching WHOs International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) chapters (DiseaseAge). We applied DiseaseAge to the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) cohort and validated its ability to identify biologically older systems in individuals diagnosed or deceased from age-related diseases affecting those systems. For instance, individuals diagnosed with high blood pressure, heart attack, congestive heart failure, or angina exhibited a biologically older circulatory system than other systems. Similarly, individuals with accelerated aging in the circulatory, musculoskeletal, or respiratory systems displayed higher risk of mortality from conditions associated with these systems. Additionally, we showed that individuals within the top 5% biologically older metabolic, circulatory, respiratory and mental systems exhibited increased risk of developing diabetes, high blood pressure, lung disease and dementia, respectively. Finally, we used metabolomics and proteomics data in the UKB and epigenomics and transcriptomics in HRS to generate omics surrogates of DiseaseAge for all physiological systems and created an online resource for their calculation.
The following analysis is generated by AI and may contain errors. It is separate from the authors’ abstract and is not peer review.
Research summary
The paper addresses the biological aging process by developing a model that estimates mortality risk based on specific physiological systems, which is relevant to understanding aging and its implications for longevity. However, while it presents solid research and contributes to the field by providing a new method for assessing biological age, the findings appear to be incremental rather than groundbreaking. The focus on mortality risk and system-specific aging is valuable, but it does not fundamentally alter the understanding of aging mechanisms or propose novel interventions to extend lifespan.
Author of this paper? Send a correction.